A. Its Form

Published in October 2004 this 376-page hard cover book has a contents page, an introduction and 18 chapters – but no Index, something that can easily be rectified if and when the book goes into a second edition. An index is essential for those who have little time to read a book from cover to cover because it makes it easier to pick out new thoughts and impressions. Glancing through an index can offer a concise summary of the subject matter. It also helps those who are self-absorbed self-seekers because they will run through the index and look for their name. If it isn’t there, they give the book a miss. It’s unlikely that I will ever reach that point of picking up a book, then run through the index just to see if I rate a mention, but an index is essential if one wishes to cross-reference subject matters and names.

I am coming closer to accepting the convention of including Bibliographical references within the text, but on a topic such as Racism it would have been helpful here to have a separate list at the end of the book. The argument that the book is not academic and that its purpose is to get the message across does not quite ring true. It would have eliminated the question of authority – on whose research or opinion is Edgar Steele basing his opinion?

Fortunately the arguments presented by Steele in the book can stand on their own and do not really need any referencing. Steele’s citing of legal cases that he personally conducted imbues his message with authenticity – Steele is not just a talker! Clearly, the book’s aim is to stimulate independent thinking and generate discussion. It is not intended to create behaviour that leads to one individual trying to outdo another in the name-dropping business. And, more importantly, Edgar Steele’s voice within the covers of his book is clear and logical – it is authoritative, he himself has become an authority whose work deserves to be quoted.

This does not mean that if he quotes someone within his text that the quotations should not be referenced – they should. The David Irving 2000 London court case teaches all authors seeking that authoritative voice to cite the reference from where a particular quotation has been taken and which is designed to prove a further point made within the text. Common Law – precedent cases – offers the creative mind a wide choice with which to decorate one’s view-point, one’s considered opinion. Of course it will be up to the judge – in this case the reader – to decide the merit or otherwise of the argument presented.

During my many years of personal litigation someone advised me to lie because you cannot win a case without lying in court. I refused because truth-telling is the foundation of our society, of our civilization. Telling lies creates dis-trust and without trust basic relationships break down, and society begins to dis-integrate. It is then a quick slide into chaos, or into the authoritarian mind-set, as we have witnessed in the so-called western democracies, Australia , in the USA/Canada, and in Europe .

Politicians cannot be trusted anymore and so the ruled do not trust the rulers. The only way of then controlling society is by implementing draconian legislative measures so as to hide the rotten state of things from the people, but still pretend that the democratic game is being played. Legislative measures are then needed to control those disillusioned individuals – who have attitude – who wanted to trust and hear the truth. Various democracies enact specific legislation ‘democratically’, usually before Christmas and late at night in parliament when most members are either absent or asleep. The examples of the past decade have focused specifically on how to combat ‘racism’, how to combat ‘terrorism’, ‘hate-speech’, ‘antisemitism’, etc. In Australia before the election there was talk of needing a strong leader in times of crisis. I would have thought that a strong democracy does not really need a strong leader because the people are strong.

We seem to have reached the stage that flourished in the former Soviet Union , where dissent was a criminal matter and where truth as a defence against any allegations became irrelevant. However, as a society’s moral and intellectual wellbeing is directly proportional to the state of its truth-telling, we are heading for trouble, for social upheaval. Little wonder then that those individuals who are currently at the helm of various social agencies in a number of these nominal western democracies are frantically devising legislation to keep the lid on the pressure cooker of lies. I still live in hope that some of them will realize that this pressure cooker has a safety-valve in the form of a simple maxim: search for truth.

So much for the importance of quotation integrity.

Typesetting is pleasing but Chapter 3 ‘Genetic Realities’, p-25-35 pages are headed ‘Cultural Imperatives’, which is Chapter 4. I found no spelling errors except the usual of mixing the plural and the possessive of 1930s, 60s, etc. with 1930’s, 60’s.The former is the plural form but rarely seems to be used as in CD’s, which should be CDs when advertising CDs for sale. Writing Adolph instead of Adolf is the fault of the spell-check!

 B. Its Contents

Dedicated to those brave souls who have fallen in the struggle to achieve true equality for all races.

 Introduction

Edgar Steele says that for a European/white there is virtually no defence against the allegation of ‘racist’ – that compound word which accuses, convicts and sentences. He suggests that instead of becoming defensive or a denier, one ought to study the obvious differences that do exist between the races. He invites his readers to read The Bell Curve, then to think things through and do independent research.

At the point of conception we are already genetically programmed and upon birth we have our half-filled ‘luggage’ that we then fill with goods from our cultural environment. He defines genetics as “culture and prior behaviour gone to seed”, and claims this view can be adopted by both Creationists and Evolutionists.

This thought raises the problem of those who base their understanding on a fixed text, and will condemn anyone who does not share such orthodoxy. As this is a peculiarly US trait, I can understand Steele wishing not to buy into that argument, thus offering a starting point that is agreeable to all. However, the objective open mind will feel restrained by this imposed framework because it begins from a fixed source. Evolution fears not the unknown while Creationism has the comfort zone well packed against any unknowable entities. After all, it is ignorance of the unknown, that can unsettle individuals who require an authoritative source to keep themselves from falling apart, not to mention the difficulty of holding together a community – pure brainpower does not!

It must be said that it is not possible to achieve total objectivity in any research, but it is understood that at least the attempt has to be made to distance oneself from personal considerations that may affect the outcome of an intellectual enquiry. The elimination of bias is far more easily achieved in the exact sciences (that are not exact) because there is always allowance made for the probability of errors. For example, some readers of The Rudolf Report found it disturbing that its author admitted that his conclusions are not absolute. But that is just the difference between those who uphold the ‘Holocaust’ gassing myth as an absolute, as a dogma fortified by specially enacted legislation that is then legally enforced. This is the stuff of which ideologies are made – not scientific research results.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle brings, as a matter of focus, uncertainty to any result. Yet science and technology have overcome this uncertainty by producing the goods that reflect approximations to such an exactitude that most times airplanes do take off and land safely. Uncertainty should thus not activate any anxieties within us because the wonders of flying re-affirm the beauties of the human mind that made it all possible. Likewise the unknown is welcomed by any enquiring mind that loves to explore unfamiliar territory. The unknown should never be feared because fear cripples the intellect, and this sets in train the fear-of-fear syndrome. It is then just a brief walk away from scapegoating anyone who ‘upsets’, who ‘challenges’ another’s world view with new information.

 I find it odd that social scientists suggest that research results ought to be 100%, and this tendency has filtered through into our education institutions where teachers award students, for example 100% for a subject such as English Literature, where improvement is always possible, where any form of expressed thought could be re-written and clarified some more.

Steele alludes to this in part when he invites his reader “you should be agreeing with how irrelevant skin color differences are,” something he finds uninteresting because there are larger issues to address. Is he a racist? Is the reader a racist?  He says that by the end of the book these two questions will have been answered.

Chapter 1: Semantics

Steele believes there is no clear agreement what a racist is, for example, the Christian Identity believe that all non-Caucasians are Satan’s “spawn”. With such individuals it is not possible rationally to discuss the race issue because their belief system obstructs it. Reason and understanding are muted by a literal belief in the Bible. Likewise, he says, it is with the secular humanists who are blinkered by their belief in the equality of man that closes their minds to definite existing racial differences. Such individuals have “hobbled” their minds and further discussion is not possible,

For Steele the definition of a racist is simple: Anyone who believes in the existence of racial differences. He points to the misuse of the term by bigots who use it as a weapon of vilification against those they disagree with. This in turn exposes the labeller’s basic problem, using words as a battle of the wills where reason and understanding are lacking. Steele invites anyone to set aside such preconceptions and to begin with him the intellectual – rational and logical – exercise of exploring, a journey that may lead to skinheads growing their hair again and to the readers feeling comfortable about calling themselves racists, without the negative connotations arising that are currently attached to the concept of race.

Chapter 2: Intellectual Myths

The fact that the human eye only perceives a fraction of reality reminds Steele of individuals who have never woken up to the fact that their own intelligence is also limited. He finds it easy to discern another person’s intelligence – “You knew who were the scholars and who were the dummies in school and you had them ranked.”

He is reminded, however, that it is character that really matters, as exemplified by intelligent Arthur Miller and his disdainful treatment of Marilyn Monroe.  

Then a delightful honest comment: “I’ve lived with the obvious difference between my own intellect and many others all my life and honestly do not consider that to make me one whit superior to anybody.”

Most mature individuals reach this point in life where one’s own limitations, one’s blind spot keep them humble. The Marxist-feminist-religious ideology of envy and hatred is a worry here because they have absorbed all this politically correct ideology. Yet the politically correct who are promoting intellectual equality are denying a fundamental facts of race difference. Steele invites his readers to read The Bell Curve where this fact is explored through various IQ studies. He says:

“There is an average 15-point IQ difference between American Whites and American Blacks … My own life experience bears witness to this fact and so does yours if you are honest, regardless of your skin color … That does  not make Whites superior to Blacks.”

He riles against the government that has adopted the One World agenda, and that will bring much grief to the country, basically proving that superior intellect may actually be a liability.

He concludes:

“It is a myth that superior intellect makes one person better than another. Recognizing this myth is key to dispelling the next: It is a myth that there are no intellectual differences between the races”.

Chapter 3: Genetic Realities

 The autobiographical sketch is delightful at this point because Steele reveals himself to be a man of many talents – living with wife and children on his ranch and raising animals, no, not just raising them but breeding animals! This work enables him to gain first-hand experience about how our genetic inheritance manifests itself. For him “instinct is genetically-encoded behaviour”, i.e. genetics as the study of culture gone to seed. It also enables him to raise the nature-nurture debate and work out how much behaviour is inherited:

“How many other response patterns lie dormant in our DNA, just awaiting a stimulus that may or may not come?”

Thus appearance, intellect/instinct and behaviour are in large measure an inherited, a racial matter. Steele then stresses what is motivating him in writing this book about race:

“What I wish to focus upon in this book in drawing racial distinctions, ultimately, is behaviour. And that is where the critical DNA difference lies… to discriminate based upon skin color makes no rational sense. To discriminate based upon behaviour, however, makes a great deal of sense.”

Through this approach he, of course, reduces the Politically Correct lobby’s work to one of manners – and some may be familiar with the maxim from one of Oxford University ’s colleges: Manners maketh Man.

Chapter 4: Cultural Imperatives

Here Edgar Steele canvases the factors that influence an individual’s character: nature/nurture, IQ/intellect/behaviour, evolution/creation, and not surprisingly, weather/climate. He correctly points out that the current multiculturalists still believe that equality between the races is a norm and that differences do not exist, something that is contradicted and glaringly evident in American ghettos where desolation rules. Were the authorities to adopt a different approach and acknowledge basic differences, then perhaps problems would be solved more readily.

He concludes:

“Descendants of race as brought together from different cultures and environments must live with the consequences of differing genetic backgrounds, though they share a similar milieu from birth.”

 Chapter 5: National Disaster

Unfortunately the politically correct deem race to be a matter of skin and economic class, something that is not borne out by human nature itself. This perversion is ruthlessly enforced through legislative means that creates thought criminals, those that still dare to think in racist concepts. This in turn, says Steele, drives the race problem underground where it is building up “plugged by societal condemnation and repressive hate crime laws. Witness the ever-growing resentment of affirmative action on both the left and the right in America … aggravated by a sense of entitlement and victimhood engendered in so many minority groups”.

He postulates that the realization is now there that so-called white separatists merely wish to live where certain desirable forms of behaviour are to be found, for example, low crime rates, good schools. He mentions South Africa and Zimbabwe as a case where the departure of whites has created chaos, where “The native population is … well, going native”.

Although the above is a physical fact, and accurately depicts the terrible suffering whites endure, I would consider it a little too simplistic because one has to factor in the multi-national force that thrives on social dislocation for the simple reason that this enables mineral exploitation. For example, Rhodesia under Ian Smith was not exploited because Smith managed to resist it up to a point, but it ultimately destroyed his country. Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe was immediately debt-enslaved by the IMF and World Bank, and social disintegration inevitably followed, with the race-card used to no good effect. I need not mention here the effect of so-called corruption. Yet we saw that factor operating so well in the dissolution of the Soviet Union when Gorbachev gave way to “free market pressure” because he obtained a payout with which to establish his own research institute – an outright bribe. If one considers how easily the mighty Soviet Union was dismembered, one need to measure the criticism leveled at African countries where infrastructures are fragile and the climate oppressive.

Steele is spot-on when he says that the world liberal establishment, especially the American has “morphed into neoconservatives and now care only about killing the enemies of Israel (including hundreds of thousands of Arab children). They certainly show no concern about the murder of White children in Africa .”

This fact highlights the ruthless nature of the Neocons and their form of world government, and Edgar Steele does not shy away from venting his anger at the form of racism called ‘affirmative action’ that has destroyed a once proud and efficient education system. He predicts that in another fifty years’ time forced integration will have destroyed the US , and the only ones who are prospering are the Jews who are considered whites. He puts the date of the US ’s decline on May 17, 1954 when the US Supreme Court handed down the Brown vs The Board of Education of Topeka decision. The hollowness of equal rights and the belief that prejudice can be overcome through legislation speaks for itself. American’s white children have been thoroughly dumbed down, thereby narrowing the racial gap downwards. The tragedy, Steele says, is that the “Blacks involved become convinced that active white racism is the real problem, not their own lack of aptitude or skills.”

And then he mentions The American Coup that began 50 years ago “when the Zionist financial cabal decided it was possible to take over America as completely and thoroughly as it had Russia a mere half century prior to that time”.

He warns that the pattern is the same because laws are already in place to limit free speech in the US , through the criminalizing of speech deemed to be antisemitic. Fro Steele, “It is no crime to demand racial equality in America … unless you are White, of course. That is what must change.”

America imprisons its citizen at a rate of 600% more than does China , something that Steele regrets because it has become an industry in itself, and that now includes political prisoners. The drive behind all this he says “is another racial group that is less obvious because of a lack of physical markers …”.

Chapter 6: Masters of Disaster

Anyone who wishes to read a concise summary of the influence Jews exert upon every aspect of the USA will find this chapter full of interesting facts, but not referenced. Steele also mentions how he became an ‘antisemite’ after his little girl received a death threat. That was it for him, and so he does not cop-out by differentiating between Zionists and Jews. The fact that a Jewish employee of his nearly ruined him added fuel to his resolve to speak out. Likewise with the 9/11 tragedy where he considers the only question to ask is whether it was the US or Israel behind it.

Jewish overreaching, he claims, is caused by the Jews literally thinking themselves to be superior to all others. He mentions that matters that most Revisionists are aware of, for example the Jewish expulsions since 415 AD, and he wonders why these statistics that are found on Jewish websites, never state why these expulsions occurred, but always claim this was an act of persecution. The next question to ask is expelled for what?

Steele makes a harsh statement that he afterwards justifies: “Just as they were in Russia last century, Jews have become the American ruling class. Just as they did in Russia , they are bleeding America dry.”

Anyone who has the disease to be persecuted will, of course, ensure that such persecution will come about!

Chapter 7:  The Price of Empire

Human genetics and culture determine the inevitable and predictable decline – that’s the message of this chapter. It does not surprise Edgar Steele that most people who play the stock market get caught and lose their money for a simple reason: they refuse to see the fact of an up and a down. So it is with individuals who refuse to see that globalism has destroyed the homogeneity of the USA .

 Chapter 8: Immigration’s True Costs

In this chapter Edgar Steele traces in some detail the decline of American enterprise. It occurred through an influx of non-assimilating immigrants that leads to a breakdown of societal controls, for example in the past not having to lock one’s home doors because crime was virtually unknown within segregated communities. He also mentions some anomalies occurring today: USA spends thousands in controlling Afghanistan/Pakistan check-points but does not seal its borders with; illegals are welcomed with open arms but its own citizens are treated like criminals.

Chapter 9: The Real Racists

Steele asks a vital question: Why do politically correct individuals refuse to admit that racial differences exist? Is this because of an inherent fear that some races are inferior or superior?  If this is so, Steele argues, it is clear who the real racists are because “Theirs is a singularly racist outlook because of the negative implications they insist upon applying to racial differences … the politically correct show they know the real score by the manner in which they handicap races they consider t be superior with such devices as affirmative action, quotas, profiling and diversity programs.”.

Chapter 10: Wag the World

Steele clarifies that he opposes Jewish supremacists-Zionists, then lists the institutions controlled by Jews, thereby making the New World Order a Jewish conspiracy because “they are facts that are unprintable, because they involve Jews.” He also criticizes Christian Zionists who are seen as ‘useful idiots’ by the Zionists. The subtle mechanism by which the ‘tyranny of the false majority’ establishes itself is clearly analyzed, with the Shabbats Goyim playing a crucial role. He implies that the Reverend Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. was one such person. Steele also likens the current US political situation to Finlandization, i.e. to that of the role adopted by Finland during World War Two and after.

Chapter 11: Racists Everywhere

The following maxim still holds, if you are not a liberal at 20, then you have no heart, but if you are still a liberal at 40 you have no head. Steele elaborates on his own mental development and how it is natural to become a social conservative and embrace racial separatism as a norm. In a letter to a friend he spells it out, “I don’t want my kids associating with White trash or knee-jerk liberals’ offspring or the kids of religious extremists”. Steele worries about the final loss of the Constitutional Amendments.

Chapter 12: The Truth Hurts

The fact that truth is no defence in court cases is a worry for Steele, and he relates a case that he fought in court –and won. He relates how difficult it is effectively to mount a defence against hate speech, even symbolic speech. It is alright for some, but not for Whites to use certain words.

Steele clearly indicates how hate crime laws protect only certain groups of people: Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, women and certain minorities. But worse of all is that the most bigoted, for example a Jew like Bernie Farber, who pushes censorship because Jewish feelings are hurt.

To date the internet still remains free, but through the forging of email and website addresses, those that fear the free flow of information will create spam, then introduce restrictive legislation with which to gain full control of the Internet. All the signs are already there for all to see in the USA .

Chapter 13: Defensive Racism

If Whites do not practice Affirmative Action, they will be labeled ‘White Supremacists’, and thereby give up their own identity, i.e. reject their European cultural heritage. The ‘Defensive Racism’ concept is used to signify survival and self determination, and it does not operate on a dialectic process where an individual is either with or against someone, as is the case with Zionists who consider anyone not with them to be antisemites. For example, it is in order to say, “When are you going to meet a nice Jewish girl and settle down?” But it is considered a racist comment to say: “When are you going to meet a nice White girl and settle down?” Steele advises how to put defensive racism into action.

Chapter 14: The Future

Reflecting on the past fifty years Edgar Steele concludes that the USA has changed for the worse in that the positive social and economic picture of the past has not been sustained for the majority and political correctness has hobbled the Whites. Racism and hate crimes are exclusively used against Whites, basic infrastructures are breaking down, the economy is floundering as “outsourcing” is institutionalized, four in every thousand are in prison and out of 300 million two million are imprisoned.

That’s the bad news, he says, and for the ‘worse news’: the future for the White race is genocide, something he claims also applies to Western Europe , birthplace of White civilization. An economic collapse is inevitable because the One World concept needs borders that in the past confined economic damage. Fiat money is the prime example of a government intent on introducing one world currency. He also mentions the Jewish conspiracy against the White race – trying to eliminate it through race mixing – as exemplified by two quotes – 1912 and 1952. Steele’s book in fact postulates that this genocide need not come about if Whites resist race mixing. Add to that the living debt bomb and something will have to give. He sees this developing into massive social upheaval, and considers that to be the reason why today police stations have already been turned into military outposts, and the ensuing social breakdown will create a situation where “your skin color will be your uniform”.

But Steele envisions an even greater crisis with the full-implementation of the Patriot Act, a foretaste being the current US adventure in the Middle East . And then he brings hope to his readers by proclaiming that the USA will come out of this crisis:

“We can do it. We will prevail. We did it before. What more proof do you need, in order to know that it is in our genetic predisposition? Because of that, we can do nothing else. Breeding shows. Character, above all else, counts. That is the legacy of our forefathers, a legacy which cannot be legislated away by Congress, judicially usurped by the courts or summarily seized by the Executive Branch. All the other stuff that has so incensed us at the moment is just words, just things, just stuff.”

Chapter 15: Treading Water

Under this chapter Steele presents basic survival information that individuals will have to know when the social breakdown occurs – arrive in the country with enough food, gasoline, bullets, gold! Safety for Whites is not to be found in the Southwest, Deep South, nor in any city, nor within 100 miles of any coast, “The more paranoid will want to stay at least 400 miles from Yellowstone Park … White America [will] be carved from the Northwest and the heartland.” Emigration is also an option, and he thinks that Russia is worth a consideration.

Steele is realistic enough to know that signing petitions, writing letters to politicians, voting, etc. is an absolute waste of time, not so joining a Patriot Movement.

Anyone who thinks Edgar Steele is alarmist and way off-beat in his speculation had better think again. It is this thought-pattern, of surviving, of developing a group strategy, which Jews have used for thousands of years.

Even at this very moment world Jewry is thinking about its own safety because Israel is a lost cause. Hence the legal protective measures already in place in Europe that aim specifically to protect Jews from any attacks, and the financial expenditures made in South America , in particular in the Chile-Argentine area of Patagonia .

This is all normal group survival thinking that Professor Kevin MacDonald so eloquently presented in his trilogy:

1.  A People That Shall Dwell Alone – Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora Peoples, 2002, ISBN: 0-595-22838-0. Writers Club Press – www.iuniverse.com  496p. (Orig pub 1994)

2. Separation And Its Discontents – Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism. 2004, ISBN: 1-4107-9260-9 (e-book), ISBN: 1-4107-9261-7 (Paperback). 1^st Books, USA . 448p. (orig  pub 1998)

3. The Culture Of Critique – An Evolutionary Analysis Of Jewish Involvement In Twentieth-Century Intellectual And Political Movements, 1998, 2002, ISBN: 0-7596-7222-9. 1^st Books, USA . 448p.

In this respect Edgar Steele has something worth while to say as to how the White group can ensure its own survival. Or is Steele merely contemplating his own personal ageing process? I think not because MacDonald does mention the importance of having an altruistic appreciation of one’s own group survival, i.e. family.

I have often wondered about this: Isn’t this the only form of immortality that we have – to leave behind our genetic information?

 Chapter 16: World War III

Steele likens today’s Middle East strife to a carbon copy of what happened twice in Europe : “Jewish interests are being pursued and vindicated, with America used as the bully boy.”

He gives a brief overview of World War One and Two and mentions the central role played by the Jews in this 30-year war.

The Middle East conflict he terms ‘ Judea against Islam’, and he postulates that history will record it having started on September 11, 2001 , with the World Trade Centre tragedy – or perhaps to the first Gulf War of 1991. The period will be marked by rampant inflation, war will distract from depression, funding will be provided by Zionist bankers who will profit hugely from it all.

The fact that President Bush claims God chose him to lead the USA clarifies how Bush got the job. The 911 tragedy is considered to be a ‘false flag’ operation “to foment public fervor for war abroad”. His comment follows the now standard skeptical framework that claims 9 11 was an insider scam, c.f. Eric Hufschmid’s analysis.

Chapter 17: Money’s End Game: Depression II

Under this 34-page chapter we find the standard analysis of how money is created out of nothing – usury objectified. This system is contrasted with the Hitler “system of barter, e.g. German locomotives for Argentinean beef where the bankers did not get their cut of the transaction that would have been guaranteed if he had been using debt-based fiat money as a medium of exchange”.

Steele predicts that gold will be the only safe investment, with silver just as safe, and central bankers will oppose it because their fiat money will be worthless, something they will oppose when they attempt to introduce a one world currency.

Chapter 18: New America

The Whites have become strangers in their own land, now strangers in a strange land where once proud symbols of nationhood have been removed. The classic example was at the WTC ruins where three white firefighters raised the flag – so the photograph, but the statue has ‘diversity’ eliminate two of the Whites replaced by a Black and a Latino. It is the phenomenon called “La Reconquista” and the reclaimed southwest America will be called Aztlan.

“America’s Zionist masters direct the efforts of the armed forces, both abroad and at home, which regularly are purged of anybody who gives the appearance of dissent. Police forces are under their direction and becoming increasingly militarized, Government workers of every stripe are being armed while America ’s citizenry is stripped of its weapons.”

And so it goes on – as Steele paints a disturbing scenario. So, you should read it for yourself – get the book because it’s well worth its price.

Conclusion

A little while ago I sent the picture of Tiger Woods with his new wife through the system, and the reaction was predictable: total tolerance – good on him if he has the money and the charm why should he stick to his own race? Why not move up to beauty? She, no doubt enjoys is fame and fortune. Then there were the primitive and crude snide remarks about the inferiority of one race to another, the dark side: uncivilized White triumphalism and supremacism.

I think in this book Edgar Steele has, in so many personal asides and in his penetrating analysis of actual current and historical events, dispelled the notion that White separatists are like the Jewish Supremacists who have utter contempt for anyone who is not a Jew. For Steele, as for me, the category of sentiment, of character is far more important than some kind of superficial marker such as skin colour. If the White race cannot retain its distinctive difference, then so be it. Edgar Steele hopes that there are enough Whites who will oppose their own extinction, even if it is only to thwart the designs of those who seek to dominate the world because their religion worships the master-servant slave thinking.

Time for you to order Edgar Steele’s book, and even if you are not White, its content will illuminate for you what ails current USA .

27 October 2004